Remaining Writing, Required and Optional

I hope that everyone is enjoying the spring recess so far!

Since we didn’t meet for class today, I wanted to update you all on the remaining opportunities you have to improve or demonstrate your mastery of the Four Capabilities, which is the sole thing that I will be looking at when assessing your final grade for the course.

You have now received all of the required writing-based-on-reading assignments, which are collected under the Reading Questions category.

Over the next week, I will be catching up on giving you feedback on any assignments I have not yet read and commented on. By April 7, I will be caught up, and after that there is one more required writing assignment for you to do. You will need to write a self-assessment of your own learning progress in the course that uses (a) the principles outlined in the rubric and (b) specific evidence from your own work in the class to justify your conclusions. This final assignment will be due by April 22 (the last day of classes for the semester). This self-assessment should be written in complete sentences and paragraphs, and should be about the length of one of your usual reading responses. It needs to be guided by all the same principles of Position Taking and Effective Communication that should guide any piece of writing in this course.

In addition to that final required writing assignment (and your group’s work for our presentation), you also have some optional things you can do if you have not yet achieved mastery of the Four Capabilities and want to show me continued progress on the rubric.

First, you can revise and resubmit up to two of any of your previous assignments in the Google Doc. Just write the new version at the bottom of your Doc and clearly indicate that it is a revision. As long as I receive these by the final day of final exams, which is May 4, I can consider them when making a final assessment of your mastery of the rubric. Keep in mind that these revisions only help you on that score if they in fact show improvement in the areas that you and I have already flagged as needing improvement, so I’d encourage you to talk with me about planned revisions, but that talk, too, is optional.

Second, you can write an optional position-driven essay based on material in one of the "extra" posts I have published on this blog—that is, posts that were not about the assigned weekly readings. These include a post about a controversial children’s book on Washington and slavery, about controversies over Woodrow Wilson at Princeton, about Presidents’ Day and the use of Presidents in election cycles, about some news items on figures we’ve studied, and about my four-year-old daughter’s perceptions of two legendary Americans. (By the way, I swear she picked out that John Henry book from the library on her own. I didn’t put her up to it!)

I’m giving you considerable flexibility with this assignment, but you need to tell me the scenario you are writing in (the form of writing, the audience, etc.) yourself and make sure that you are taking a position. The audience could, of course, just be me, and you can treat this essay much like a standard reading response. But if one of the areas you need to work on is audience awareness, it might be in your interest to think about how you could use the assignment creatively to show progress on that skill.

Because of these optional assignments, you have no shortage of ways to show that you have mastered the Four Capabilities by the end of the semester. But remember that because of the way your grade will be assigned, simply doing these optional assignments doesn’t immediately give you extra credit. The optional assignments help you improve your grade only insofar as they help to demonstrate your mastery of the rubric.

This Wednesday: Workshop on Style

Andrew Klein, a lecturer in the Program in Writing and Communication, is going to be holding a workshop this Wednesday from 7 to 9 p.m. in the CWOVC (Fondren Library 201). The workshop is on improving the clarity of your written work. Klein says, “It will address aspects of academic writing at the sentence, paragraph, and text levels so as to enable students to produce smooth, readable prose that takes the reader from sentence to sentence in a coherent manner.”

I would strongly encourage all of you to attend, as I think it could be of benefit to anyone! But I would especially encourage any of you who have been getting comments from me about Effective Communication to consider going. Remember that Self-Reflection, in terms of our rubric, means you can “honestly identify areas for improvement in your own understanding, and then execute and evaluate strategies for addressing them.” Attending a workshop like this is one such strategy, and by going to the workshop, you’ll learn other strategies for improving your work!

Writing Assignment for Feb. 25

Before writing in your Google Doc this week, be sure to complete the reading assignments. Then you’ll be ready to write this week’s writing assignment.

For that writing assignment, I want you to develop a position of your own on some question that has arisen so far in this course. I’m giving you greater latitude in terms of topic than I’ve given you before, but you should not forget to keep the learning rubric in mind as you write.

After you’ve developed a position that you’d like to take, you can craft an essay for ONE of the following scenarios:

  • Imagine you are submitting a 700-word op-ed reader essay to the Houston Chronicle.
  • Imagine you are writing an email home to one of your high school American history teachers.
  • Imagine you are addressing a letter to your elected representative on the Texas State Board of Education.

Put your assignment in your Google Doc as usual.

Also, here are some reading questions that I’d like you to consider. You are not required to use them to frame your writing assignment, but they and the other reading questions we have discussed this semester may help you form your position.

  1. Do you agree with James Loewen that “heroification” in American history textbooks is a problem? If not, be sure to respond directly to his arguments and show why you think they are faulty. If you do agree with Loewen’s analysis of “heroification,” what are some possible solutions? Be sure to use examples and evidence from Loewen’s article when answering this prompt to demonstrate that you understand his argument, whether you agree with it or not.
  2. Based on evidence presented in this week’s readings, how much of a role do you think textbooks, schools, and educators play in Americans’ sense of history and the past? If Americans have a distorted or selective view of the past, are teachers and schools the primary culprits? Or are there other causes that you can point to?
  3. Both Sam Wineburg and Michael Frisch report on experiments they have done that are very similar to the exercise we conducted on our first day of class this semester. What do you think their findings tell us about the way American students view America and its history? Be specific in your discussion of their findings, and notice that the articles are separated by about twenty years.
  4. Do you think there are hidden costs to society or national unity if “heroes” are “debunked”? Based on your evaluation of the costs and benefits of dispelling legends about the past, do you think the goal of teachers of history be to represent the past as faithfully as possible, warts and all, or do you agree with social conservatives on the Texas Board of Education that history teachers should represent America as positively as possible?

Upcoming Style Workshop

Andrew Klein will be offering a workshop on “improving writing style” this Wednesday evening at the Center for Written, Oral, and Visual Communication. I recommend it if you have time to go! Here’s his description, as sent out to all FWIS instructors:

I’ll be teaching a workshop on “Style” at the CWOVC–Fondren 201–this Wednesday, from 7:00 – 9:00. It’s designed for undergraduate students who are seeking to improve the clarity of their written work. It will address aspects of academic writing at the sentence, paragraph, and text levels so as to enable students to produce smooth, readable prose that takes the reader from sentence to sentence in a coherent manner. I won’t claim that it will solve your student’s writing problems, but it should be able to offer them a few concrete strategies to improve their clarity. All students are certainly welcome to sign up, but it will be particularly helpful for those who have trouble at the level of the sentence. If you have anyone in your classes this semester who you think might benefit from this, please encourage them to attend.

So this is me, encouraging you to attend!

Welcome!

Welcome to FWIS 173: Legendary Americans! Take a look at the syllabus, which will introduce you to this course. The schedule overview will keep you up to date on what we are doing each week.

As you’ll see on the schedule for the first day, one of the first things you should do is work on acquiring the required books for this class, which are available online and also at the campus bookstore.

On this main blog page, I will be making regular posts, and you should keep up with updates to this blog throughout the week. Since we will only be meeting as a class once a week on Thursdays, this blog will serve as a way for all of us to keep in touch throughout the week and make our meetings more productive. When I want to communicate with all of you as a class, I am more likely to post to this blog than to send out a mass email, so if you don’t check in, you might miss an important announcement.